Take that, you punk-ass journal referee! Read the referenced paper next time, before you start beef! Even the footnotes!
"(b) In some studies, we report the coordinates of subpeaks not reported in the digital papers, which reported a single global maximum for each cluster."
that's why we used {-48,-44,52} and {52,-44,52} instead of {-32,-72,52} and {32,-60,44}.
WHO'S YOUR FACT-CHECKING DADDY NOW?!?!
Give it up! Unh! Unh! Hit that "ACCEPT FOR PUBLICATION" button, baby! You're gonna hit it and you're gonna' like it!
(who? . . . what? . . . where am I? what happened? i'm sitting in lab . . . huh. oh, well. back to work.) posted by Miles 10:22 AM